AB Data

But this “firefighting” model, like sailing without a compass, often leads to costly delays, budget overruns, and reduced quality. However, a shift is happening—and it’s changing the way construction projects are managed. It’s no secret that waiting for the storm to hit isn’t the most efficient or productive strategy. The difference now is that advanced tools are available to predict problems before they occur, effectively plan for risks, and navigate project complexity.


But the question is, how can this transformation be achieved effectively? Passive vs Active In construction project management, a reactive approach is like playing a constant game of catch-up. It’s an approach uganda whatsapp that deals with problems as they arise, like a game of whack-a-mole. Essentially, teams react to problems as they occur, rather than anticipating and planning ahead of time—one of the main reasons why projects end up delayed.


In many cases, this reactive strategy is not a conscious choice, but rather a reaction due to a lack of proper planning, inadequate risk assessment, or insufficient data to enable foresight. This approach often leaves teams under constant pressure to deal with one crisis after another, leaving them with little time for strategic planning or foresight. If a reactive approach is akin to putting out a fire as it breaks out, a proactive approach in construction project management can be compared to fireproofing a building in advance.