Google Search Quality Evaluation Guidelines

[mdmarouf988]

Be prepared that you need to pay for every task that was not agreed upon earlier. This is something obvious to you, or you think that some functionality should have been included in the work by default. If you did not explicitly talk about it (and did not write it down), then most likely it was not taken into account by the contractor. Neither in time nor in money. If you start to put pressure on him, then not everyone can honestly say "you did not pay us for this." They will suffer themselves, and you. But no one will get the result.
The contractor can parallelize processes to speed something up. But admit to yourself honestly - it depends on him, not on you. Therefore, ask the contractor for everything sequentially. Agree that you first accept point 1, and then move on to point 2. The option that you send edits on the first big task and then immediately ask: "and what about the second one, by the way?" - does not exist in nature.
YMYL is an abbreviation for "Your Money or Your Life" and refers to a special genre defined in the Google Search Quality Evaluation Guidelines.

For information that is essential for making important decisions about people's lives, such as about their finances and health, search results are evaluated with greater emphasis italy whatsapp number database on reliability and accuracy, and this was updated in Japan in 2017.

For example, if you are feeling unwell and search for symptoms and find incorrect information, you may end up taking the wrong treatment, which could make your condition worse.

Also, if you blindly accept incorrect information when considering a financial product, you may end up wasting a lot of money.

In this way, information that has the potential to disrupt the environment in which people can live in peace has been designated a category and is subject to more strict evaluation.

Reference:

Why YMYL was added to the Google guidelines
The first reason why Google decided to add YMYL is because of its "user-first" policy. Google always values ​​sites that provide content that is beneficial to users, so it was only natural that information that is not beneficial to users and may even be a threat to users was the target of increased crackdown.