Thus, by deploying itself in various philosophical frameworks, QASEM must make it possible to determine the public decisions best suited to the objectives pursued by public decision-makers while explaining the choices made in terms of social justice. For example, in order to improve accessibility by public transport, a territory can decide to implement free transport. But it can also decide to introduce a different rate for students, in order to meet a need. The two measures meet the same objective of improving accessibility by public transport, but according to different ethics. The first measure is of an egalitarian nature, it treats the entire population in the same way. The second is of a prioritarian nature and favors a part of the population, judged to be more in need. In other words, QASEM makes it possible to highlight the potentially differentiated effects of policies on the population.
Thus, the Quality Adjusted Sustainable and Equitable Mobility Index, or QASEM , is a decision-making tool for fairer and more sustainable public transport and mobility sweden phone number list policies. It must first make it possible to establish a diagnosis of mobility in a territory by identifying the level of accessibility, exposure to road risk, the effect on health of travel, and the level of greenhouse gas emissions. It must then help policy makers and mobility operators determine which transport and mobility policies contribute to a fairer and more sustainable society, and then contribute to their implementation and evaluation.
In particular, it allows us to show what the potential effect of several policies is on the different aspects of mobility. For example, by determining what the effects of building a new cycle path and opening a new public transport line are on the level of accessibility, exposure to road risk, the effect on health of travel, the level of greenhouse gas emissions.
By allowing the comparison of expected effects, QASEM is a decision-making tool for transport and mobility policies on a territorial scale. As such, it is aimed at both public decision-makers and transport operators. It should allow us to think about mobility in its entirety and show that we can improve both the environmental impact and the well-being of individuals of mobility.