This is when we understand that there is no way to completely separate what is public and what is private. Large private companies have a huge impact on people's lives, whether they are employees of the business or not. It is no surprise that professionals responsible for Government and Institutional Relations (RIG) must play the role of defending interests in a lawful and legitimate manner, both public and private, for the regulation of operations.
So, for whatever reason – employability, use of new technologies, changes in the environment or production of relevant revenue for the country – each institution carries the responsibility of being an agent of social transformation, and this must be faced in a serious and organized manner if there is the intention of making a positive transformation possible.
Well, now that we have a more solid idea that everything that happens, even outside the legislative environment, is in fact a situation that directly impacts the life of any citizen, it is easier to state that hong kong mobile database democracy is not a model implemented once and that follows a linear course. The democratic model did not happen, but it can happen every day. Democracy is more like a living organism, which needs adjustments and attention so that it is not suffocated by the lack of collaboration of those who coexist in this government regime.
However, before it is possible to actively participate in the construction of proposals and the development of laws, a primary need must be met, opening up the real possibility of social engagement: access to information and transparency in public administration. And, in addition to access to data, it is essential to think about another aspect capable of facilitating the population's participation in decision-making processes: clarity in understanding actions.
In other words, being transparent means ensuring the possibility of consultation, providing access to debate and promoting a reduction in the distance between those who govern and those who are governed. The less difficult it is for us to be close to the country's political decisions, the greater the chance of observing flaws in the democratic process, in addition to identifying acts of corruption in the approval or rejection of projects and the construction of public policies.
In Brazil, we are not yet accustomed to thinking of lobbying as a way to speed up or slow down the decision-making process of legislators. The profession of lobbyist is often associated with scandals and raises the discussion about the best way to serve society. The fact is that lobbyists, or RIG professionals, are increasingly taking on the role of combining public data and private information to create a “win-win” scenario between the interests of the government and institutions interested in acting in a more participatory and democratic manner.