Google AMP is in fact an excellent "buffer" on Core Web Vitals: being a Google proprietary technology, in 90% of cases it does exactly what Google expects. Also you can usually deploy AMPs without changing servers, which is obviously an advantage. The problem with AMPs is that there are strong limitations in terms of layout (and lead generation)… but we'll go into more detail about this shortly. SEO Consultant Could I not mention the SEO expert ? The task of a consultant in this case is really important.
In fact, it is he who must direct the optimization process, harmonize hong kong phone data everything and ensure that the technical team works in a functional way for positioning. In short, peace of mind! Read also: Hotlinking & WordPress: and why Can AMPs Solve Core Web Vitals? Let's try to clarify this point: AMP and Core Web Vitals do NOT replace each other . It is true that they have the same function, in the sense that the essential signals are created to promote mobile browsing, just like AMPs.
And it is true that, as we said before, translating pages into the Google AMP version can save a site in the "Deep Red zone" without having to redo everything from scratch. (That said, a mobile version and an AMP version can coexist on the same site , without having to fight) However, there are some problems to take into consideration when we talk about AMP. For starters, a site with AMP no longer has to look at user experience and essential web signals in its entirety, so much so that Core Web Vitals also affect desktop browsing, albeit to a lesser extent.